05.01.2023 | The Anticorruption Court has verified that the soldiers have stolen diesel fuel allocated to the military unit

The Acting Head of the Combustible Materials Service of the Military Unit N of the Ministry of Defense, with the preliminary agreement with a group of people, stole diesel fuel amounting to 236.169 AMD.

 

In particular, it was found out that S.T., being responsible for supervising the works of accepting, preserving and releasing the expenses and lubricants, special liquids and technical means, having close relations with the shooter A.G., took 80 thousand AMD from him.

 

          After that, in the aim of repaying the debt and selling the additional diesel fuel to A.G. for 400 AMD for 1 liter, on May 18, 2022, he acquired the agreement with the latter about stealing the fuel of the military unit in the manner of assignment and realizing it.

 

S.T., the acting Head of the Combustible Materials Service of the Military Unit N of the Ministry of Defense, in the aim of ending his illicit intention, recommended the soldier, G.A., to take out 480 liters from 5065 liters diesel fuel entrusted to him from the ”Ural” brand refueling car of the Ministry of Defense and hand it to paramilitary shooter to A.G. in the unused gas station of the administrative territory of Noratus community. 

 

On May 20, 2022, at 10:30, A.G. went to the unused gas station by car, where the soldier, G.A. drained from the mentioned refueling car and charged totally 480 liters diesel fuel amounting to 237.609 AMD in 24 containers with a capacity of 20 liters.

 

On October 25, 2022, the criminal proceedings according to the judgment of  S.T., the acting Head of the Combustible Materials Service of the Military Unit N of the Ministry of Defense, in accordance with Article 179, Part 2, Point 1 of the Criminal Code adopted 18.04.2003 (assignment of significant sizes using a position), and paramilitary shooter A.G., in accordance with Article 38-179, Part 2, Point 1 of the Criminal Code adopted on 18.04.2003, has been sent to the court (it has been decided not to initiate a public criminal prosecution against G.A. on the basis of Article 12, Part 1, Point 1 of the Criminal Procedure Code, that is the person hasn’t done the action he/she is charged for).

The supervising prosecutor made a motion to the Ministry of Defense to observe the expediency of the further service of the mentioned military soldiers.